# Top 5 App Development Companies in Sydney *Published:* 2026-05-01 *Author:* Steven Jacob ![Line illustration of a business owner reviewing an app development proposal with a remote team](https://bestforandroid.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/how-to-hire-app-developers-an-in-depth-guide-bnw-hero-1.jpg) A phone app used to be a marketing line item. Now it is where the booking happens, where the invoice gets paid, and where a customer decides whether your business is worth the trouble. That shift is why the choice of development partner has stopped being an IT decision and started being a commercial one. .bfa-widget{--bfa-brand:#44706E;--bfa-brand-deep:#1f3837;--bfa-brand-soft:#e8efee;--bfa-secondary:#3f8d2a;--bfa-secondary-deep:#2a6b1c;--bfa-ink:#0e1a1a;--bfa-ink-soft:#4b5c5b;--bfa-soft:#728483;--bfa-paper:#f9f9f9;--bfa-paper-pure:#ffffff;--bfa-line-warm:#44706e1a;--bfa-line:#e3e3e6;--bfa-accent:#0693e3;--bfa-warn:#a8642e;--bfa-warn-deep:#7a4a1f;--bfa-danger:#cf2e2e;--bfa-ok:#3f8d2a;} .bfa-illustration{margin:30px auto} .bfa-illustration img{display:block;max-width:600px;width:100%;height:auto;margin:0 auto;border-radius:14px} .bfa-pick{background:#ffffff;border:1px solid #e3e3e6;border-top:3px solid #44706E;border-radius:16px;padding:22px 26px;margin:26px 0;box-shadow:0 1px 2px rgba(0,0,0,0.04),0 10px 26px rgba(68,112,110,.06)} .bfa-pick p{margin:0 0 12px;color:#0e1a1a} .bfa-pick p:first-of-type{margin:0 0 10px;color:#44706E;font-size:11.5px;letter-spacing:.14em;text-transform:uppercase;font-weight:700} .bfa-pick p:last-of-type{margin-bottom:0} .bfa-pick-verdict{font-family:'Fraunces','Source Serif 4',Georgia,serif;font-size:1.2rem;line-height:1.35;color:#1f3837} .bfa-pick-for{color:#4b5c5b;font-size:.95rem} .bfa-comparison{margin:30px 0;overflow-x:auto} .bfa-comparison table{width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:15px} .bfa-comparison th{background:#44706E;color:#ffffff;text-align:left;padding:12px 14px;font-size:11px;letter-spacing:.1em;text-transform:uppercase;border:0} .bfa-comparison td{padding:12px 14px;border-bottom:1px solid #e3e3e6;color:#0e1a1a;vertical-align:top} .bfa-comparison tbody tr:nth-child(odd) td{background:#f9f9f9} .bfa-comparison td:first-child{font-weight:600;color:#1f3837} .bfa-callout{background:#f9f9f9;border:1px solid #e3e3e6;border-left:4px solid #a8642e;border-radius:14px;padding:22px 26px;margin:30px 0} .bfa-callout p{color:#0e1a1a;margin:0 0 10px} .bfa-callout p:first-of-type{margin:0 0 12px;color:#7a4a1f;font-size:12px;letter-spacing:.14em;text-transform:uppercase;font-weight:700} .bfa-callout p:last-of-type{margin-bottom:0} .bfa-key-takeaways{background:#f7f7f7;border:1px solid #e3e3e6;border-radius:14px;padding:22px 26px;margin:30px 0} .bfa-key-takeaways p:first-of-type{margin:0 0 12px;color:#1f3837;font-size:12px;letter-spacing:.14em;text-transform:uppercase;font-weight:700} .bfa-key-takeaways ul{margin:0;padding-left:20px} .bfa-key-takeaways li{margin:0 0 8px;color:#0e1a1a} .bfa-key-takeaways li:last-child{margin-bottom:0} .bfa-checklist{background:#ffffff;border:1px solid #e3e3e6;border-left:4px solid #3f8d2a;border-radius:14px;padding:24px 26px 24px 46px;margin:30px 0} .bfa-checklist ul,.bfa-checklist ol{margin:0;padding-left:8px} .bfa-checklist li{margin:0 0 12px;color:#0e1a1a;padding-left:4px} .bfa-checklist li::marker{color:#2a6b1c;font-weight:700} .bfa-checklist li:last-child{margin-bottom:0} .bfa-faq{background:#ffffff;border:1px solid #e3e3e6;border-radius:14px;padding:8px 26px 12px;margin:30px 0} .bfa-faq h3{font-size:1.05rem;color:#1f3837;margin:18px 0 6px} .bfa-faq p{color:#4b5c5b;margin:0 0 16px} @media(max-width:600px){.bfa-comparison table{font-size:13px}.bfa-comparison th,.bfa-comparison td{padding:9px 10px}}.bfa-hero{container-type:inline-size;container-name:bfahero;background:#e8efee;border:1px solid var(--bfa-line-warm);border-left:4px solid var(--bfa-brand);border-radius:26px;padding:clamp(1.6rem,4.4cqi,2.9rem) clamp(1.3rem,4cqi,2.6rem);margin:0 0 30px;font-family:'Inter',system-ui,sans-serif;color:var(--bfa-ink)} .bfa-hero-eyebrow{display:inline-flex;align-items:center;gap:11px;font-size:12px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.15em;text-transform:uppercase;color:var(--bfa-brand-deep);margin:0 0 .9rem} .bfa-hero-eyebrow::before{content:'';width:24px;height:2px;border-radius:2px;background:var(--bfa-brand);flex:none} .bfa-hero-h{font-family:'Fraunces','Source Serif 4',Georgia,serif;font-weight:400;font-size:clamp(1.55rem,4.4cqi,2.25rem);line-height:1.12;letter-spacing:-.02em;color:var(--bfa-brand-deep);margin:0 0 .8rem} .bfa-hero-h em{font-style:italic;color:var(--bfa-warn-deep)} .bfa-hero-body{font-size:1.0625rem;line-height:1.62;color:var(--bfa-ink);margin:0 0 clamp(1.3rem,3cqi,1.8rem);max-width:64ch} .bfa-hero-body strong{color:var(--bfa-brand-deep)} .bfa-hero-grid{display:grid;grid-template-columns:1fr;gap:clamp(.75rem,2cqi,1rem)} @container bfahero (min-width:520px){.bfa-hero-grid{grid-template-columns:repeat(3,1fr)}} .bfa-hero-cell{background:var(--bfa-paper-pure);border:1px solid var(--bfa-line-warm);border-radius:16px;padding:clamp(.95rem,2.2cqi,1.25rem)} .bfa-hero-val{font-family:'Fraunces','Source Serif 4',Georgia,serif;font-weight:400;font-size:clamp(1.1rem,2.5cqi,1.35rem);line-height:1.15;color:var(--bfa-brand-deep);margin:0 0 .35rem;min-height:1.2em} .bfa-hero-cap{display:block;font-size:12.5px;line-height:1.45;color:var(--bfa-soft)}Sydney buyer’s guide Five app builders, sorted by *the job you need done* **The short version:** Appello Software is the safest first call if you want one Sydney team to scope, build and then keep the app alive. Techugo and Magora go deeper on AI and heavyweight engineering. Techgropse is the budget-conscious offshore route. StepInsight is for companies whose real problem is a broken workflow rather than a missing app. AUD 120 to 180 Typical Sydney agency blended rate, per hour 600 to 1,200 hrs Engineering time for a mid-complexity build AUD 60k to 250k End-to-end native build, scoping through launch The awkward part is that every agency site reads the same. Same stock promises, same logo wall, same claim about being your long-term technology partner. The differences only show up once money is committed: how tightly they scope, whether they document anything, who answers when an OS update breaks the login screen at eleven at night. What follows is five Sydney options, compared on what they actually build and who they are wrong for. The order matches the original shortlist. Read it with your own project in mind, because the right answer changes completely depending on whether you are launching a first app, chasing a funding round, or trying to unpick a workflow that four systems already half-own. Five providers, five different bets. Appello runs a full-cycle in-house model. Techugo sells breadth, particularly on AI. Techgropse competes on price through offshore delivery. Magora leans on native engineering depth. StepInsight starts at the process layer and treats the app as an output. None of them is the best; each is the best answer to a different question. ProvidersStrongest atDelivery modelIndicative bandAppello SoftwareFull-cycle custom builds, enterprise and internal systemsSydney-based, in-house teamUpper mid-marketTechugoGenerative AI, automation, wearables and emerging surfacesGlobal delivery with local account coverMid to upperTechgropse FZC LLCCross-platform apps on fixed-scope packagesOffshore-ledBudget to midMagoraNative engineering, MVPs, complex backendsDistributed engineering podsMid to upperStepInsightProcess automation, systems integration, legacy migrationConsulting-led, build secondMid to upperThe table below is the fastest way to see the shape of each one. Rate bands are indicative Sydney market ranges rather than quoted prices, and every provider will move on them depending on scope, contract length and how much of the work sits offshore. One more thing worth saying before the list. If you have never commissioned software before, read our longer piece on [choosing a mobile app development partner](https://bestforandroid.com/dev/choosing-mobile-app-development-partner/) alongside this one. It covers the contract mechanics, intellectual property ownership and escalation paths that a comparison table cannot. \#1. Appello Software --------------------- Pick 01 One Sydney team from the first scoping workshop to the post-launch support ticket. Best suited for: startups building a first custom app, and established businesses modernising internal systems. [Appello Software](https://appello.com.au/services/software-development/mobile-app-development-in-sydney) builds custom mobile applications for iOS and Android, plus hybrid and cross-platform work where a single codebase makes more sense than two. The catalogue runs wider than apps alone: enterprise systems, e-commerce platforms, CRM and ERP implementations, API integrations between tools that were never meant to talk, and app store optimisation once the thing is live. Web platforms, wearables, AI features and AR work sit on the same menu. ### ✨ What they offer The distinguishing feature is process rather than technology. Work starts with a scoping phase and a written cost estimate, moves through documented development with regular reporting, then testing, release and ongoing maintenance. That sounds like table stakes until you have sat through a project where nobody could produce a spec and every change became a negotiation. For a business without an internal technical lead, having one accountable team across the whole cycle removes the single most expensive failure mode in software: the gap between what was agreed and what was understood. ### 💡 Why choose them Because the risk profile is the lowest on this list. A local team means meetings in your timezone and a legal relationship under Australian law. In-house delivery means the people who scoped the build are the people writing it. And a documented handover means you are not held hostage if you later move the work elsewhere, which is the quiet reason to care about documentation at all. ### ⭐️ Best suited for Startups launching a first customer-facing product, businesses replacing spreadsheets and paper forms with something staff will tolerate, and any company that wants one number to call when something breaks. Less suited if your entire proposition is a novel AI model and you want a research-grade team, or if the budget is genuinely fixed at the low end. \#2. Techugo ------------ Pick 02 The widest service surface of the five, and the one most comfortable shipping AI into production. Best suited for: enterprises, funded startups, and public sector or healthcare teams with automation on the roadmap. Techugo covers native iOS and Android alongside React Native and Flutter, so the framework conversation is a genuine choice rather than a house preference dressed up as advice. Around that sit generative AI features, chatbots, AI copilots, backend and API engineering, UI and UX design, and QA. They also build for smart TV, wearables, [VR and AR products](https://www.forbes.com/sites/ariannajohnson/2023/06/02/augmented-reality-ar-vs-virtual-reality-vr-whats-the-difference-and-how-do-they-work/), voice interfaces, IoT devices, blockchain and the web. ### ✨ What they offer Breadth, mostly. The practical value of that breadth is that a roadmap can grow without a re-tender. If the app launches this year and the automation layer arrives next, the same team can carry it. Their AI work is the part worth pressing on: ask what they have actually shipped rather than what they can list, because the gap between a demo and a production feature with monitoring, evaluation and a fallback path is where most AI projects quietly die. ### 💡 Why choose them If your competitive edge depends on something more interesting than a nicely built form, this is the shortlist entry that has already solved the adjacent problems. Enterprise clients tend to like the single-vendor coverage; regulated sectors tend to like that the compliance and QA conversation happens with the same people doing the building. ### ⭐️ Best suited for Enterprises and well funded startups, plus public sector, education and healthcare organisations where automation is the point and the app is the delivery mechanism. Overkill for a simple two-screen utility. \#3. Techgropse FZC LLC ----------------------- Pick 03 Fixed-scope packages and offshore delivery, for teams where the budget is the binding constraint. Best suited for: startups and SMEs in healthcare, fintech, retail, logistics and real estate. Techgropse builds native iOS and Android apps and does a lot of cross-platform work in React Native and Flutter. The wider practice takes in AI, blockchain, AR and VR, e-commerce, IT consulting, [DevOps](https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/devops/introduction-to-devops/) and cloud management, which means the infrastructure side of a launch does not have to be someone else’s problem. ### ✨ What they offer Packaged scopes at a defined price. That structure is genuinely useful when you need to take a number to a board or a bank, and it forces a discipline that open-ended time and materials contracts never do. The trade is flexibility: a fixed scope means change requests are a formal event, so the thinking has to happen before the contract, not during sprint six. ### 💡 Why choose them Cost, mainly, and there is nothing wrong with that. Offshore delivery moves the effective rate well below a Sydney in-house team, and for a well specified app that difference can be the reason the project happens at all. The two things to settle first are timezone overlap for daily contact and who owns the repository, the accounts and the signing keys. Get both in writing. ### ⭐️ Best suited for Startups and small to medium businesses in healthcare, fintech, retail, logistics and real estate that have a clear brief and a firm ceiling. Weaker fit if the requirements are still moving or if on-site collaboration matters to you. \#4. Magora ----------- Pick 04 Native-first engineering and the deepest backend bench on the list. Best suited for: enterprises and founders who need an investor-ready MVP that survives technical due diligence. Magora writes iOS in Swift and SwiftUI, maintains Objective-C where legacy code demands it, and builds Android in Kotlin against the native SDK, with Xamarin available for shared-codebase projects. Server side, the team works across PHP, Node.js, Java and .NET, with React and Angular on the front end. The applied AI practice covers [LLM-powered products](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7fl6He1lxM), retrieval pipelines that ground a model in your own data, IoT and machine learning automation. ### ✨ What they offer Engineering depth, and a dedicated MVP practice that matters more than it sounds. A minimum viable product built badly is worse than no product, because it burns the one round of goodwill you get with early users and it will be read as a proxy for your technical judgement by anyone doing diligence. Magora treats the MVP as a real architecture that ships fast, rather than a prototype that gets renamed. ### 💡 Why choose them When performance, offline behaviour or platform-specific hardware access matters, native beats a wrapper, and Magora defaults to native. Their retrieval-augmented generation work is also the more sober end of applied AI: grounding answers in your own documents instead of hoping a general model guesses right. If you want to see how that fits a wider product plan, our piece on [how AI is changing mobile development](https://bestforandroid.com/dev/ai-transforming-mobile-dev/) covers the same ground from the product side. ### ⭐️ Best suited for Enterprises with complex integrations, and finance, logistics, healthcare and pharmaceutical companies where the data model is the hard part. Also founders who need the build to hold up under investor scrutiny. \#5. StepInsight ---------------- Pick 05 The one that asks whether you need an app at all, then builds the thing you actually need. Best suited for: midmarket and SMB teams carrying manual processes, legacy systems or disconnected tools. StepInsight leads with AI transformation planning, AI-powered automation and AI agent development, then digital operations transformation, systems integration and legacy migration. The build side covers custom mobile apps, client portals, booking systems, dashboards and reporting tools, which is the visible half of work that mostly happens underneath. ### ✨ What they offer A consulting engagement first. They map how the work moves through your business, find the handoffs where information falls on the floor, and only then decide what software should exist. Sometimes the answer is an app. Often it is an integration, a set of automated steps and a dashboard that stops three people from asking the same question every Monday. ### 💡 Why choose them Because a surprising number of app projects are really process projects wearing a costume. If your staff currently rekey the same order into two systems, a beautiful mobile interface on top of that mess just makes the mess faster. StepInsight is the entry on this list most likely to talk you out of the brief you arrived with, which is either exactly what you want or exactly what you do not. ### ⭐️ Best suited for Midmarket, small business and enterprise teams that need workflow automation, systems integration or legacy modernisation. They work across education, financial services, logistics, government, hospitality and real estate, all sectors where the process debt is usually older than the software. What a Sydney build actually costs ---------------------------------- Nobody publishes real numbers, so here is the shape of the market as quoted to Australian buyers. Sydney developer rates average around AUD 152 an hour, with juniors closer to AUD 85 to 110, mid-level engineers AUD 110 to 150, and seniors AUD 150 to 210. Specialists in machine learning command AUD 200 to 300. Agencies usually quote a blended rate of AUD 120 to 180 that averages the team across a sprint. ![Line illustration of a cost breakdown being calculated for an app development project](https://bestforandroid.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/cost-calculations-for-hiring-android-developer-bnw-hero.jpg) Multiply that by the hours and the picture gets honest. A mid-complexity app with accounts, payments, notifications and an admin panel takes roughly 600 to 1,200 engineering hours before launch. End-to-end native builds commonly land between AUD 60,000 and AUD 250,000 depending on how much backend work sits behind the screens. Offshore delivery can cut the effective rate by half or more, which is the entire commercial argument for it. Cost lineWhat it coversTypical shareDiscovery and scopingWorkshops, user flows, technical spec, estimate5 to 10 percentDesignUX architecture, UI system, prototypes10 to 20 percentEngineeringApps, backend, integrations, admin tooling50 to 65 percentQA and releaseDevice testing, store submission, fixes10 to 15 percentMaintenance, per yearOS updates, dependency bumps, small changes15 to 25 percent of build costThat last row is the one that ruins budgets. Software is not a capital purchase that sits still. Two OS releases a year, certificate renewals, deprecated APIs and store policy changes all arrive whether or not you funded them. Our breakdown of [cost calculations for hiring an Android developer](https://bestforandroid.com/cost-calculations-for-hiring-android-developer/) goes further into how in-house and agency maths compare over three years. Where AI earns its place, and where it does not ----------------------------------------------- Four of the five providers here sell AI services, which tells you more about procurement fashion than about engineering. The useful question is narrower: does a model do something in your app that conventional code cannot, and can you tell when it gets it wrong? ![Illustration of AI features being built into a mobile application interface](https://bestforandroid.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/ai-in-mobile-app-development.jpg) The features that reliably pay for themselves are unglamorous. Document understanding that removes manual data entry. Support triage that routes a ticket before a human reads it. Search that answers from your own policies instead of returning ten links. Each of those has a measurable before-and-after, and each degrades gracefully when the model is unsure. Contrast that with a chatbot bolted onto a home screen because a competitor shipped one; those get built, get ignored, and quietly get removed at the next redesign. Before you approve an AI feature: write down what the feature does when the model is wrong. If the answer is that a human never finds out, the feature is not ready. Ask for the evaluation set, the monitoring plan and the running cost per thousand requests, because inference is an operating expense that scales with your success, not a one-off build line. Five questions that separate a partner from a vendor ---------------------------------------------------- Every agency will answer yes to can you build this. These are the questions where the answers actually diverge, and where you learn what the relationship will feel like in month eight rather than week one. 1. **Who owns the code, the repository and the store accounts?** The correct answer is you, from day one, with your own Apple and Google developer accounts. Anything else makes leaving expensive on purpose. 2. **What happens in the first year after launch?** Ask for the maintenance retainer in writing, with a response time. An agency that has not thought about year two has priced only the fun part. 3. **Can I see the technical spec from a recent project?** Redacted is fine. If none exists, the process is improvised, and improvised processes are where scope disputes are born. 4. **Which of your people will I actually work with?** Names, seniority and how much of their week you get. Pitch teams and delivery teams are frequently different people. 5. **What did you get wrong on your last project?** The only question here with no good scripted answer. A team that can describe a real failure and what changed afterwards is a team that runs retrospectives. Take references, and take them from projects that finished more than a year ago. A client three months past launch is still in the honeymoon. A client two years in has been through an OS upgrade, a store policy change and at least one urgent bug, and can tell you how the agency behaved when it was inconvenient. What happens after you ship --------------------------- The launch date is a milestone, not a finish line, and the post-launch phase is where the choice of partner either pays off or starts costing you. Two gatekeepers decide whether your release goes out at all, and both of them change their rules without asking. ![Illustration of a team planning the ongoing roadmap for a launched mobile app](https://bestforandroid.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/ai-mobile-app-development-strategic-approach.jpg) On iOS, every build is reviewed against Apple’s [App Store Review Guidelines](https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/), which cover everything from privacy disclosures and account deletion to how you are allowed to take payment. On Android, Google Play enforces its own [developer content policy](https://play.google.com/about/developer-content-policy/), including data safety declarations and permissions justification. Rejections are routine and usually fixable in days, but only if someone on your side of the contract owns them. Play also enforces a rolling [minimum target API level](https://developer.android.com/google/play/requirements/target-sdk) for anything you submit. An app that stops being maintained does not fail loudly; it just quietly becomes impossible to update, and eventually new users cannot install it at all. That single rule is the strongest argument for signing a maintenance agreement at the same time as the build contract. Then there is the ordinary maintenance grind: OS releases twice a year, third-party libraries that go unmaintained, certificates that expire, analytics that drift. Budget for it as a running line rather than an emergency. If testing discipline is a concern, our guide to [Android QA and testing](https://bestforandroid.com/dev/android-dev-qa-testing/) covers what a competent release process looks like from the client side. The clause people forget Ask what happens to your app if the agency goes quiet. Source code in your own repository, credentials in your own vault and a written deployment runbook turn a crisis into an inconvenience. Negotiate it while everyone still likes each other. How to build your own shortlist ------------------------------- Five names are a starting point, not a market. Sydney has a deep bench of independent studios and specialist teams that never appear in roundups because they do not chase them. Building your own list takes an afternoon and is the single highest-return hour of the whole process. Where to lookWhat good looks likeRed flagVerified review directoriesNamed client contacts, project values, reviews that mention specific frictionOnly five-star reviews, all posted in the same monthTheir own case studiesNumbers, constraints, and what they would do differentlyLogos with no outcome and no client nameThe app storesLive apps you can download, with recent update datesPortfolio apps that no longer existYour own networkA peer in your industry who has finished a buildA recommendation from someone still in month twoThe first meetingThey interrogate your business model before quotingA price before a single question about usersShortlist three, brief them identically, and compare how differently they interpret the same document. That variance tells you more than any portfolio. The team that comes back with the awkward questions you had not considered is usually the team that will not surprise you with an invoice later. If you are weighing a local agency against a distributed team, our notes on [hiring React developers](https://bestforandroid.com/dev/how-to-hire-react-developers/) apply to the same hiring calculus. Common Concerns --------------- The questions Sydney business owners ask most often once the shortlist is drawn up and the quotes start arriving. ### How long does a Sydney app build take? A focused MVP usually runs three to four months from kickoff to store submission. A mid-complexity app with payments, accounts and an admin panel typically takes five to eight months. Anything quoted at six weeks is either very small or leaving out testing. ### Native or cross-platform? Cross-platform with React Native or Flutter is the sensible default for most business apps and saves real money on a two-store launch. Go native when performance, offline reliability or deep hardware access is central to the product. Ask the agency to justify the choice against your requirements rather than their bench. ### Is offshore development a false economy? Not inherently. It fails when the brief is vague, the timezone gap kills the feedback loop, or nobody on your side can review technical work. It succeeds when the specification is tight and there is a named local point of contact. Judge it on those conditions, not on geography. ### Who should own the developer accounts? You should, always. Register your own Apple Developer and Google Play accounts in the company name and add the agency as a team member. Apps published under an agency account are painful and sometimes impossible to move. ### What should I budget for maintenance? Plan on 15 to 25 percent of the original build cost every year. That covers OS compatibility, library updates, store policy changes and small improvements. Skipping it for two years usually costs more than paying it, because the catch-up work compounds. The bottom line --------------- Sydney’s app development market covers everything from full-cycle local agencies to offshore delivery teams and AI-first consultancies, and the right choice comes down to the purpose of the app, the budget, the technical complexity, your industry and how much support you will need after launch. - **Appello Software** offers the strongest balance of local presence, structured process and end-to-end support, which makes it the default first call for most first builds. - **Techugo** is the pick when AI and automation are the point rather than a feature. - **Techgropse** makes the numbers work through offshore delivery and fixed-scope packages. - **Magora** brings the deepest native engineering and the most credible MVP practice. - **StepInsight** is right when the real problem is the workflow, not the missing app. Whichever way you go, the decision that matters most is not on this page. It is whether you commission the work with a written scope, your own accounts, and a maintenance budget already approved. Get those three right and a good agency will do good work. Get them wrong and even the best team on this list will end up in a dispute with you about what was agreed.